18 DHC 2026
21 - 23 January 2026
Immunology Abstracts (4)
sessie basaal
1436: Donor–recipient TCR comparisons show limited αβ but persistent Vδ2⁺ γδ clonotype overlap
22 January
10:45 11:00
Anniek Stuut
Paper

Donor–recipient TCR comparisons reveal limited αβ but persistent Vδ2 γδ clonotype overlap after CMV reactivation in allo-HSCT

Anniek Stuut (1), Anke Janssen (2), Peter Brazda (1), Farid Keramati (1), Tim Hutten (3), Froso Karaiskaki (1), Trudy Straetemans (1,2), Dennis Beringer (1), Zsolt Sebestyen (1), Julia Drylewicz (1), Moniek de Witte (2), Jurgen Kuball (1,2)
(1) UMC Utrecht, Center for Translational Immunology, Utrecht, (2) UMC Utrecht, Department of Hematology, Utrecht, (3) UMC Utrecht, Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Utrecht
No potential conflicts of interest
Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) profoundly reshapes T-cell immunity. Moreover, CMV reactivation is known to drive clonal T-cell expansion after allo-HSCT, but it is still unclear how donor-derived ab and gdT-cell clonotypes persist and differentiate in recipients, especially after abT-cell-depleted grafts. We aimed to characterize donor-recipient TCR sharing, gd T-cell clonal dynamics, and effector programming after CMV reactivation in allo-HSCT recipients who received either abT-cell-depleted or T-cell-replete grafts. 

Methods

We performed 5′ single-cell RNA sequencing on samples collected ~1 year after allo-SCT. The cohort included six recipients, all of whom had experienced CMV reactivation: three who received an αβ T-cell–depleted graft and three who received a T-cell–replete graft. In addition, we analyzed paired donor samples for five of these transplant pairs (αβ T-cell–depleted n=3, T-cell–replete n=2), and we included longitudinal pre- and post-CMV reactivation samples from two recipients. Clonotypes were defined by CDR3 sequence identity. 

Results

Donor–recipient comparisons revealed minimal sharing of αβ TCR clonotypes, regardless of graft type, suggesting limited persistence of donor-derived αβ T cells. In contrast, Vδ2 γδ T-cell clonotypes were frequently shared between donors and recipients, indicating selective persistence of this subset. Vδ2 γδ clonotypes expanded post-CMV reactivation, but were typically absent in donor samples, suggesting de novo emergence in the recipient. ~1 year after allo-HSCT, CD8 αβ and Vδ2 γδ T cells exhibited cytotoxic effector phenotypes marked by distinct granzyme expression profiles. Transcriptional imprinting differed by graft type, with AREG enriched in Vδ2 γδ T cells from T-cell–replete allo-HSCT recipients, and KLRC2/3 upregulated in CD8 αβ T cells from αβ-depleted allo-HSCT recipients.

Conclusion

Our findings reveal distinct T-cell reconstitution patterns following allo-HSCT in patients with CMV reactivation, characterized by limited persistence of donor-derived αβ T-cell clones, selective retention of Vδ2 γδ T-cell clonotypes, and expansion of de novo Vδ2- γδ T-cell clonotypes. These findings highlight the contribution of both γδ and αβ T-cell subsets to antiviral immunity after allo-HSCT, with γδ T cells potentially playing a compensatory role when αβ T-cell reconstitution is limited. 

Attachments
Register
×